Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-15

PADAM RATTAN vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 21310/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
PADAM RATTAN
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

2026:PHHC:076540 seesanass CRM-M-21310-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 CRM-M-21310-2026 Date of decision: 15.05.2026 PADAM RATTAN ....-Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Dishant Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amritpal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab. 2k ook 2 ok RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.20 dated 19.01.2026 registered under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 at Police Station City 2 Mansa, District Mansa, Punjab (Annexure P-1). 2. Brief facts of the present case are that as per the prosecution, on 19.01.2026, police party was on a patrolling duty and on the basis of suspicion apprehended the petitioner. On search, the petitioner was found in conscious possession of 05 vials of Wenrex and 100 intoxicating tablets of Carisoma. Hence, the present FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no concern with the said offence. H