OMPARKASH AND ANR vs UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 131 CWP-14815-2026 Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 OMPARKASH AND ANR. ...Petitioners Vs. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED & ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of order dated 25.11.2025 whereby respondents have granted Rs.10,59,978/- on account of death of his son. He is further seeking reasonable compensation as per policy dated 08.07.2019. 2. This is second round of litigation. The petitioner on an earlier occasion approached this Court by way of CWP-30778-2025 which was disposed of vide order dated 16.10.2025 to decide his claim. The respondent vide order dated 25.11.2025 granted him compensation of Rs.10,59,978/- in view of death of his son. He claims that the compensation has not been calculated as per the policy as well as not taking into account the profession of the deceased. The respondent has wrongly assessed monthly income t