Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-12

OM PARKASH vs THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 14659/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
OM PARKASH
Respondent
THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

2026:PHHC:074429-DB CWP-14659-2026 oa 150 -]- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14659-2026 Date of Decision :-12.05.2026 Om Parkash .-+- Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ......-Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Ajit Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondents. sek RK SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Counsel for the petitioner states that the dispute is squarely covered by judgment dated 22.12.2025, Annexure P23, passed by this Court in CWP-16389-2025 titled “Ram Lal Mahendru Versus State of Haryana and others”. 2. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon respondents. 3. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents. He submits that the matter is 2026:PHHC:074429-DB CWP-14659-2026 ee 150 -2- squarely covered by the judgment in Ram La/ Mahendru’s case (supra). 4. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, writ petition is disposed of in the same terms as in Ram Lal Mahendru’s case (supra). (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) JUDGE 12.05.2026 Brij Whether speaking/reasoned_ : Yes/No Whether Reportab