Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

OM PARKASH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 17675/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
OM PARKASH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-17675-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.230 CRM-M-17675-2026 Decided on : 25.05.2026 Om Parkash ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL *** Present : Mr. Gaurav Luhani, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana. *** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.108 dated 31.05.2025, registered under Sections 103(1), 126, 127(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 61 of the BNS, 2023, at Police Station Nathu Sarai Chopta, District Sirsa. 2. Brief facts, as per the prosecution case, are that the petitioner alongwith co-accused armed with sticks, axe etc. gave beatings to the complainant, his son and daughter-in-law. Due to the said injuries, the son of the complainant died. Hence the present FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.26 17:50 contends that neither the petitioner was present at the