Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

OM BAHADUR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 27238/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
OM BAHADUR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

PARR, 2026 PHHC.078268 Segeeeees IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 CRM-M-27238-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 19.05.2026 OM BAHADUR ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: | Mr. Pardhuman Garg, Advocate and Mr. Reetinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate, for the complainant. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel states that the petitioner is in custody only for 2 months and 11 days and the complainant is yet to be examined, in view of which, his learned counsel does not press the instant petition, at this stage. 2. Ordered accordingly. 19.05.2026 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes/No PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.19 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and ord Kedgment.