(O&M) KARNAIL SINGH AND ANR vs JAGDISH SINGH AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (204) RSA-3533-2008 (O&M) Date of Decision:-01.05.2026 KARNAIL SINGH AND ANOTHER … Appellants Versus JAGDISH SINGH AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. None is present on behalf of the appellants. Neither the previous order with regard to the deposit of cost of Rs.2000/- has been complied with. It seems that appellants have lost interest in pursuing the appeal. 2. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. As a natural corollary, since the main case stand dismissed for want of prosecution of, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping them pending. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 01st May, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.05.01 03:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document