Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-07

(O&M) GANESH CHAND vs KEWAL KRISHAN

Citation / case number
RSA 21/1989
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
(O&M) GANESH CHAND
Respondent
KEWAL KRISHAN
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

RSA-21-1989 (O&M) -:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-21-1989 (O&M) Reserved on :-28.04.2026 Date of Pronouncement:- 07.05.2026 Uploaded on:- 08.05.2026 Ganesh Chand (Since Deceased) Through his LRs … Appellant(s) Versus Kewal Krishan ... Respondent **** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :- Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Inderjeet Singh, Advocate and Mr. Utkarsh Khatana, Advocate for the appellant(s). Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate for the respondent. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. 1. The present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter to be referred as ‘RSA’ for short) is preferred by the appellant-defendant to impugn the judgment and decree dated 28.11.1988 rendered by the learned District Judge, Sangrur. By way of the aforementioned decree, the lower Appellate Court affirmed the findings of the learned Sub-Judge Ist Class, Malerkotla, dated 04.09.1986, whereby the respondent-plaintiff’s suit for a mandatory injunction seeking possession or, in the alternative, a decree for possession was settled in favor of the respondent. GAURAV SOROT 2026.05.08 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-21-1989 (O&M) -:2:- 1.1. The