Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-29

NITIN SAINI @ NITTEN vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 23469/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NITIN SAINI @ NITTEN
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 118 CRM-M-23469-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 29.05.2026 Nitin Saini @ Nitten … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Balbir Kaur Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) CRM-23976-2026 In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the hearing of the main petition is preponed from 28.07.2026 and the same is taken on Board today itself. CRM-M-23469-2026 Fresh Vakalatnama has been filed by Mr. Balbir Kumar Saini, Advocate on behalf of the petitioner after obtaining no objection from the previous counsel i.e. Dr. Sumati Jund, Advocate, and the same is taken on record. Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. GEETA RANI 2026.05.30 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh CRM-M-23469-2026 (O&M) (2) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitte