Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-12

NISHAN SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

Citation / case number
CRM-M 310/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NISHAN SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 242 CRM-M-310-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.05.2026 Nishan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Ms. Kritika, Advocate for Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing respondent No.4 not to take forcible possession of the vehicle No.PB-02-ET-9866. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is squarely covered by the judgments passed by this Court in Ranjeet Singh vs. State of Punjab and Others, CRM-M-59214-2023 and Sunil Kumar vs. State of Punjab and Others, CRM-M-60911-2023, which were disposed of vide orders dated 24.11.2023 and 04.12.2023, Annexures P-7 & P-11 respectively, by relying on the judgment of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in ICICI Bank Ltd. vs. Parkash Kaur and Others, 2007(2) SCC 711. In this regard, an application/representation dated 27.12.2025, Annexure P-4, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. MOHIT 2026.05.12 16:33 I attest to