Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

NISHA THAKRAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CWP 11241/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NISHA THAKRAL
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-11241-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No. 115 CWP-11241-2026 (O&M) Decided on:11.05.2026 Nisha Thakral . . . Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana assisted by Mr. Harmanjit Singh Johal, Advocate. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J.(ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to count the service of the petitioner as deemed service with effect from 19.09.2019, along with all consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to decide her pending representation, dated 11.03.2026, Annexure P-11, in a specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Learned State counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that the pending representation, dated 11.03.2026, will be decided by respondent no.2/Director General, Higher MEHAK HU