Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-13

NIRMAL SINGH vs NASEEB SINGH AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CR 2261/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NIRMAL SINGH
Respondent
NASEEB SINGH AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2261-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:13.05.2026 NIRMAL SINGH ...Petitioner Versus NASEEB SINGH AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Karandeep S. Dargan, Advocate and Mr. Harmanbir S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present revision petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by petitioner-plaintiff being aggrieved by impugned order dated 29.01.2026 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Malout in Civil Suit No.198 of 2023 whereby, petitioner-plaintiff’s evidence was closed on the ground that petitioner-plaintiff has failed to conclude his evidence, despite availing sufficient opportunities. 2. Facts in the present case are not in dispute. Issues were framed on 15.02.2026, thereafter, matter is pending since 27.03.2025 for evidence of petitioner-plaintiff. Effective opportunities to lead evidence were granted to the petitioner-plaintiff on various dates i.e. 01.05.2025, 09.07.2025, 24.07.2025, 27.08.2025, 18.09.2025, 25.09.2025, 09.10.2025, 17.11.2025, 02.12.2025, 22.01.2026, 29.01.2026, ex