NIKITA AGGARWAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 CWP-21848-2020 Date of decision: May 18, 2026 NITIKA AGGARWAL ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Abhishek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aakash Singla, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the orders dated 21.08.2019, Annexures P-8 to P-11, whereby the claim for reimbursement submitted by the petitioner for the expenses incurred on her husband’s treatment for brain tumour, a chronic disease, from Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, has been rejected. Further, a writ of mandamus has been sought directing the respondents to reimburse medical expenses amounting to ₹4,75,165.80, incurred on the outdoor treatment of the petitioner’s husband from 07.10.2017 to 19.03.2018, 23.06.2018 to 25.06.2018, 10.01.2018 to 23.04.2018, 16.07.2018 to 09.11.2018, 01.01.2018 to 20.06.2018. 2. As per facts apparent on record, the petitioner’s husband underwent indoor as well as outdoor treatment at the Apollo Hospitals for brain tumour. The respondent/Depar