Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

NEMPAL vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 18895/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NEMPAL
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-18895-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 221 CRM-M-18895-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.05.2026 NEMPAL ......PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA . ..... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, Asstt. A.G. Haryana. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. 1. This petition for bail is third petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. This petition has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.290 dated 26.11.2024, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 of Indian Penal Code, Police Station Sanoli, Panipat, District Panipat. 2. Briefly stating the facts emerging from record are that the FIR of VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.12 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-18895-2026 (O&M) 2 this case came into being on a complaint submitted by ‘Rajinder’ son of ‘Sahi Ram’, who had stated that his son namely ‘Ankush’ and brother ‘Joginder’ were confined in District Jail, Panipat on account of conviction in a criminal case. According to complainant, in the s