Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-07

NEHA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 23353/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NEHA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-23353-2026 (O&M) 1 111+223 notcalr a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23353-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 07.05.2026 NEHA «PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .+s RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Ms. Garima Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) CRM-19776-2026 This is an application for placing on record the photocopy of the compromise dated 02.04.2026 as Annexure P-7. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Annexure P-7 is taken on record. CRM-18218-2026 Allowed as prayed for. Exemption sought for is granted. CRM-M-23353-2026 1. The present first petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 26 dated 27.02.2026, Under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340, 61 of POONAM NEGI 2026.05.08 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-23353-2026 (O&M) 2 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Sections 406, 420, 468, 470, 471 rea