NEERJA vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7059/2026 & CM APPL. 34593/2026 Date of Decision: 20.05.2026 IN THE MATTER OF: NEERJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary Ms. Kuna Sachdeva and Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Gauri Goburdhun, Sr. Panel Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition concerns the alleged deletion/alteration of order dated 03.10.2024 purportedly passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [NCDRC] in execution proceedings. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that originally Annexure P-1 order was passed on 03.10.2024 which, however, was surreptitiously deleted and instead Annexure P-2 order was uploaded. 3. When the petitioner approached the NCDRC by way of application Annexure P-6, the NCDRC passed an order on 25.03.2026 directing the Registry to ensure that the certified copy of the signed order is handed over Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR Signed SHARMA Signing Date:22.05.2026 By:PURUSHAINDRA 13:26:44 Page 1 of 4 KUMAR KAURAV to the complainant/petitioner. 4. It is thereafter, Annexure P-2 order was handed over to the petitioner which, according to the petitioner, is not the same, which was originally uploaded on 03.10.2024. 5. The petitioner has various evidences to substantiate his submissions that the order which was uploaded on 03.10.2024 was different from the one which was handed over to the petitioner pursuant to the NCDRC directions. 6. The Court thus finds that the nature of the grievance is required to be appropriately considered by the NCDRC itself. 7. If a party believes that the proceedings in Court have been incorrectly