Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

NEERAJ VERMA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 25429/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NEERAJ VERMA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-25429-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 242 CRM-M-25429-2026 Date of decision: 11th May, 2026 Neeraj Verma ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Randeep Singh Dhakla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Simranpreet Singh Sambhi, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner seeking grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 39 dated 28.02.2026 registered under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of IPC (Sections 465, 468 and 471 of IPC added later on) at Police Station Thanesar City, District Kurukshetra. 2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint moved by the complainant Chandgi Ram, alleging that the accused Satish Kumar had told him that his son Neeraj, i.e. the present petitioner was engaged in the business of sending public persons abroad and was running an office at Kurukshetra. The complainant was interested to send his son to Australia on s