Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

NEERAJ KUMAR SAKHAYA vs SANDEEP SHARMA

Citation / case number
CRR 1420/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NEERAJ KUMAR SAKHAYA
Respondent
SANDEEP SHARMA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRR-1420-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 123 CRR-1420-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.05.2026 Neeraj Kumar Sakhaya ..... Petitioner VERSUS Sandeep Sharma ..... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Ms. Anita Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed this revision petition against the order dated 20.02.2026 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge Ambala, hereinafter being referred to as ‘Appellate Court’ only, whereby while suspending the sentence of the petitioner, the learned Appellate Court directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount as a condition precedent. The petitioner has been convicted for the commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, hereinafter referred to as ‘NI Act’. 2. The record reveals that the petitioner faced a trial in a complaint case, titled as ‘Sandeep Sharma Vs. Neeraj Kumar Sakhaya’, for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 138 of NI Act. The abovementioned trial culminated into conviction of the petitioner. The learned trial Court sentenced the pe