NEERAJ AND ORS vs PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ORS

CWP-4309-2022 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (216) CWP-4309-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.05.2026 Neeraj and others …Petitioners Versus Punjab and Haryana High Court, ...Respondents Chandigarh and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Tarun Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Harkirat S. Jagdev, Advocate for Mr. Aalok Jagga, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Avinit Avasthi, Addl. Standing Counsel and Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No.3-U.T. Chandigarh. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant writ petition, cast under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for quashing of the impugned order dated 31.05.2019 (Annexure P-7), wherethrough, the respondent No.2, has rejected the claim of the petitioners, to retain their lien on the post of Clerk, for the purpose of pay protection and consequential benefits. 2. At the outset, learned counsel representing the respondents No.1 and 2, apprises this Court that they are under process to reconsider the claim of the petitioners, afresh. MANPREET SINGH 2026.05.12 09:08 I attest to the