Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-15

NAVEEN vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
CRM-M 18530/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NAVEEN
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-18530-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.101 CRM-M-18530-2026 Date of Decision: 15.05.2026 Naveen .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Paramjit Singh Jammu, Advocate, Mr. Santosh Kumar Yadav, Advocate, and Mr. Jasbir Singh Thind, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to conduct fair and impartial investigation in case FIR No.0052 dated 20.03.2025, registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, at Police Station Dadri City, District Charkhi Dadri. 2. On the last date of hearing, learned State counsel had submitted that investigation of the case was almost complete, and the agency was not able to present the final report only because report from the Regional Forensic Science Laboratory (RFSL), Sunaria, Rohtak, regarding handwriting of the accused was awaited. Now, on instructions from Sub Inspector Sanjay, State Crime Branch, Bhiwani, she informs that the report has been received from the RFSL. It wi