Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

NAVEEN @ CHHAILA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 10823/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NAVEEN @ CHHAILA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 234-I CRM-M-10823-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 26.05.2026 Naveen @ Chhaila … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Baljeet Nain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Singh Pannu, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ***** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) 1. By way of the present petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short - ‘the BNSS’) , the petitioner is seeking regular bail in case bearing FIR No.282 dated 11.09.2024, registered under Sections 308(2), 329(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short - ‘the BNS’) (Sections 61(2), 111(2-ii) and 113(3) of the BNS added later on) at Police Station Narwana Sadar, District Jind, Haryana. 2. Briefly stated, present FIR was registered on complaint of one Baljit, alleging that he had received threatening calls demanding ransom of Rs.50,000/- per month or partnership in liquor business. On the basis of said complaint and disclosure statement of co-accused, the petitioner came to be nominated in present case. Allegations qua the petitioner is that he is a member