Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-12

NAVEEN BHATTI vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 12719/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NAVEEN BHATTI
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

215 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-12719 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 Naveen Bhatti ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh. Present: Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Rohit Bansal, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent. Surya Partap Singh, J. 1. This petition for bail is the second petition filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No. 22 dated 27.02.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 109, 126(2), 132, 221, 303(2), 190 and 191(3) [Section(s) 115(2), 118(1), 117(3), 110 and 118(2) added lateron] of ‘the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023’ and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station City Batala, District Batala, Punjab. 2. The FIR of this case came into being at the instance of ‘Kamla Bhatti alias Baggison’, hereinafter being referred to as “complainant” only. It was stated by the above-named complainant that on 26.02.2025 at about 08:30 P.M. he was standing in the street where