NAVAL KISHORE AND ORS. vs STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 16.05.2026 CRL.M.C. 98/2026 NAVAL KISHORE AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Tuba Uroosa, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the State with SI Vinod Kumar Mr. Daya Ram Badalia, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 (through videoconferencing). CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 103/2012 of PS Palam for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. CRL.M.C. 98/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa 3. The respondent no. 2, appearing through videoconferencing, is identified by IO/SI Vinod Kumar. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromise