NATASHA vs KUNAL MADOK

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.211 TA-217-2026 Date of Decision: 01.05.2026 NATASHA ....Applicant Versus KUNAL MADOK .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- None ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the applicant, despite the case having called twice. Even, notice could not be issued to the respondent, for want of process fee. Seemingly, the applicant is not interested in pursuing the present application. Hence, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. (ARCHANA PURI) 01.05.2026 JUDGE Sonu Saini Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No SONU 2026.05.01 15:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document