NARINDER KUMAR BANKA vs UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11554-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 19.05.2026 Narinder Kumar Banka … Petitioner Versus Union Territory Chandigarh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Ravinder Singh Randhawa, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Karanyog Riar, Advocate, Ms. Mamta, Advocate, and Mr. Vinay Saroha, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Abhinav Sood, Addl. Standing Counsel, Mr. Sabir Singh, Jr. Panel Counsel, and Mr. Nitesh Jhajoria, Advocate, for the respondent-UT, Chandigarh. Mr. Ishan Kaushal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to protect his and his family members' life at the hands of private respondents. He is also seeking direction to respondents to look into his complaints seeking protection of life and liberty. He is also seeking direction to private respondents not to indulge in any kind of harmful and dangerous activities against him & his family and to maintain proper distance from his son. 2. The petitioner is a practicing advocate. His son is a