NARAIN WOOD PVT. LTD. vs SNEH BABUTA & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 20th May, 2026 + CM(M) 1191/2026, CM APPL. 34698/2026 NARAIN WOOD PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pranav Gambhir and Mr. Vipin Bhasker, Advocates. versus SNEH BABUTA&ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate (through VC). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 34699/2026 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM(M) 1191/2026 & CM APPL. 34698/2026 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 17th February, 2026 passed by the learned trial court in CS (COMM) 469/2023, whereby the applications filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XI Rule 1 read with Order VII Rule 14 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) for bringing on record additional documents, has been dismissed, as well as the subsequent order dated 25th April, 2026, whereby the application filed on behalf of the petitioner/plaintiff under Order VI Rule 15 & 15A read with Section 151 of the CPC for striking off the defense of the defendants has also been dismissed. 4. Heard. Record perused. Signature Not Verified Signed By:MANISHA CM(M) 1191/2026 Page 1 of 2 RAJPUT Signing Date:20.05.2026 16:37:53 5. Learned counsel for the respondents has appeared on advance notice and accepts notice. 6. During course of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing for any other relief except for the relief that the petitioner be given an opportunity to cross-examination of DW-1. It is further submitted that if opportunity to cross-