NANAK CHAND TAYAL AND ANR vs KOYAL

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 130-2 CRM-M-16699-2022(O&M) Decided on: 06.05.2026 NANAK CHAND TAYAL AND ANOTHER .....Petitioners Versus KOYAL ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Jagjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioners have been acquitted by the trial Court. 2. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of, as having become infructuous. 3. Pending applications if any, also stand disposed of. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 06.05.2026 Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO SONIA PURI 2026.05.07 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document