Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

NAIB SINGH @ NAIBI vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 12427/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NAIB SINGH @ NAIBI
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

241 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.12427 of 2026 Date of decision: 18.05.2026 Naib Singh @ Naibi …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT Present :- Mr. Karan Vir Nanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, Asstt. AG, Punjab, for the respondent-State. ***** N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant regular bail to him in case FIR No.96 dated 13.08.2025, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 191(3), 190 of BNS {corresponding Sections 341, 323, 506, 148, 149 IPC}, registered at Police Station Cheema, District Sangrur wherein Sections 109 and 333 BNS (corresponding Sections 307 & 452 IPC) are stated to have been added later-on. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely involved in the present case and the offences under Sections 109 and 333 BNS, 2023 were added later on just to make the offence graver. In fact, all the nine injuries suffered by the complainant were simple in nature and the offence under Section 109 BNS, 2023 had been