Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-22

NABAB vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 13065/2021
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NABAB
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-13065-2021 1 2026:PHHC:087452 Beers, pe nad IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13065-2021 Decided On: 22.05.2026 NABAB ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ... .RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Deepak Grover, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG Haryana SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) KEKE K 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner with effect from 31.01.1996 instead of 01.10.2003, along with all consequential benefits, in terms of the policy dated 07.03.1996 (Annexure P-1), as subsequently modified on 18.03.1996. The petitioner has further placed reliance upon the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.1787 of 2002 titled Chhote Lal and others v. State of Haryana and others (Annexure P-4), as well as the judgments in Kavita Gandhi v. State of Haryana and others, reported as 1997 (4) RSJ 760, and the Full Bench decision of this Court in Tek Chand v. State of Haryana, reported as 2001 (3) RSJ 604. 2. Learne