Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-29

MUSKAN vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
LPA 324/2022
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MUSKAN
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

LPA No.324 of 2022 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 LPA-324-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 MUSKAN .....Appellant Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ........Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Ankush Aggarwal, Advocate and Mr. Jatin Bansal, Legal Aid Counsel, for the appellant. Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.4. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. In the present appeal, the challenge is to the impugned judgment dated 02.03.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition filed by respondent No.4 has been allowed. 2. The question which arises in the present appeal is whether, there was a valid dispute with regard to the title of the land, which has been acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (for short, ‘the NHAI’) so as to direct the Land Acquisition Authority to decide the same qua the compensation paid. 3. Certain facts need to be noted for the correct appreciation of the issue in hand. The notification bearing S.O. No.2179 (E) under Section 3-A (1) of the National Highways Act, 1956 (for short, ‘the 1956 Act’) was issued