MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, TOHANA ,TEH TOHANA, DIST FATEHABAD vs RAM NARAYAN AND ANR

-1- 150 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-4417-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, TOHANA ...Petitioner Versus AM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Shashank Bhandari, Advocate Ms. Manu Loona, Advocate Mr. Mrinal Dewan, Advocate for the petitioner. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) The present civil revision petition has been preferred under Article 227 of Constitution of India by petitioner/defendant for setting aside of order dated 09.10.2025 (Annexure P-5A), passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tohana whereby application moved by respondents/plaintiffs to de-seal shops was allowed as well as order dated 31.01.2026 (Annexure P-7), passed by learned Additional District Judge, Fatehabad whereby appeal against order dated 09.10.2025 (Annexure P-5A) was dismissed. 2. The Court below have duly concluded that despite order dated 19.03.2025, petitioner/defendant had sealed the suit property on 02.09.2025. On consideration, I do not find any error in the conclusion drawn by both the Courts below. Admittedly, in the suit preferred by respondents/plaintiffs, status quo order was