Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL KAITHAL vs GULSHAN KUMAR SATIJA

Citation / case number
RSA 2728/2024
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL KAITHAL
Respondent
GULSHAN KUMAR SATIJA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

RSA-2728-2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 151 RSA-2728-2024 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.05.2026 Municipal Council Kaithal ...... Appellant versus Gulshan Kumar Satija ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Akash Yadav, Advocate for Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellant. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Defendant is in appeal aggrieved of concurrent judgments and decree passed by Courts below. 2. Plaintiff filed suit seeking decree of permanent injunction restraining defendants from interfering in his lawful possession over the suit property as detailed out in the plaint. 3. As per the case of the plaintiff, the suit property, i.e. two shops forming part of khasra No. 243 min situated within the municipal limits of Kaithal are owned and possessed by him. Plaintiff purchased the same vide registered sale deed dated 27.06.2005 from Rajesh s/o Jogi Ram, who was owner in possession of the suit property on the strength of registered sale deed dated 27.04.1988. 4. His vendor was declared to be owner in possession vide Civil Court decree dated 14.09.1983 passed in Civil Suit No.721/83 titled as Rajinder vs. Hawa Sin