Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

MUNAM ALIAS MUNNA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
INCOMP 1097/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MUNAM ALIAS MUNNA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.166 INCOMP-1097-2026 Date of Decision:04.05.2026 MUNAM ALIAS MUNNA ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- None. JASJIT SINGH BEDI , J. (Oral) The instant petition was instituted in this Court on 20.01.2026 The petition was scrutinized by the Registry and certain objections were raised, but the learned counsel did not take steps to remove the said objections during the prescribed period of 40 days, as prescribed in Rule-9 Chapter-1, Part-A, Volume-V of Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules & Orders. Even after the publication of the note on the official website of this Court requesting the Advocate to collect the instant case for re-filing after removal of objections, the case was though re-filed, but the needful was still not done. The Registry has consequently listed the matter before this Court “under INCOMPLETE category” seeking appropriate orders. Even today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the petition. The petition, as such is disposed off for want of