Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

MUKUL vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 30371/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MUKUL
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-30371-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 274 CRM-M-30371-2026 Date of decision: 25.05.2026 MUKUL ......PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA ..... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Vikram Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. 1. This petition for bail is the first petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. This petition has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.258 dated 07.11.2025 for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 190, 191(2), 351(2), 296, 109, 110, 61(2) and 117(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Police Station Civil Lines Bhiwani, District Bhiwani. 2. The FIR of this case came into being at the instance of ‘Satya Parkash’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. It was stated stated by the above named complainant that on 06.11.2025 at about 6.00 P.M. he was working in his flour mill when he heard a commotion and came out of VIPIN KUMAR his shop, where he came to know that ‘Bhanu’, his nephew in relation, was 2026.05.26 10:07 I attest to th