Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

MUKESH vs ROHTASH AND ORS

Citation / case number
RSA 1027/2020
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MUKESH
Respondent
ROHTASH AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

-1- 106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1027-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:26.05.2026 MUKESH ...APPELLANT Versus ROHTASH AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Ivneet Singh Pabla, Advocate for the appellant. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present appeal has been preferred by appellant-defendant No.1 being aggrieved by concurrent finding of facts recorded by learned Courts below vide impugned judgment and decree dated 30.09.2016 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bahadurgarh whereby suit for possession and permanent injunction preferred by respondents-plaintiffs was decreed and also by judgment and decree dated 16.08.2019 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Jhajjar whereby first appeal preferred by appellant-defendant No.1 was dismissed. 2. Respondents-plaintiffs had preferred suit for possession against defendants seeking possession of suit land shown with letters EFGH in the site plan attached with the plaint, allegedly comprised in khasra No.5316/823 and 5317/823 measuring 10 biswa situated at Preet Vihar area, Balor Road, Bahadurgarh. They had also sought permanent injunction seeking to restrain defenda