MUKESH vs PRESIDING OFFICER,INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ET

212 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13931-2001 Date of Decision:19.05.2026 MUKESH .....Petitioner VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER,INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, ETC. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Polist, Advocate, for respondents no.2 and 3. KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) 1. Mr. Vinod Polist, Advocate, has caused appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3, through a validly executed power of attorney in his favour. The same is taken on record. 2. As per the office report, court notice issued to the petitioner has been received back with the report that the petitioner has died on 10.01.2024. 3. Till today, the legal representative(s) of the deceased petitioner have not come forward to continue with the instant lis. 4. In such circumstances, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the instant petition for want of prosecution. 5. Dismissed for non-prosecution. DHARAM VIR 2026.05.20 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-13931-2001 -2- 6. However, liberty is reserved to the legal representatives/heirs of the deceased petitioner, to revive the instant petition by