MUKESH KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 116 CWP-9522-2026 Date of Decision: 06.05.2026 MUKESH KUMAR …Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Sagar Ratusaria, Advocate with Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate and Ms. Sidhi Bansal, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Satya Pal Jain, A.S.G. (through V.C.) with Ms. Neha Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel For respondent-U.O.I. Mr. D.K. Singal, Advocate and Mr. Manav Singal, Advocate For respondent No.2 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to de-freeze his Bank Account maintained with respondent No.2 - YES Bank. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent- Bank has frozen petitioner’s account without notice. As per petitioner’s information, the Bank has acted upon directions of Law Enforcement Agencies. He is not involved in any criminal activity. He is not named in any SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.06 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- FIR relating to financial fraud, if any, committed by unknown persons. There is