Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

MUKESH KUMAR vs BINAY KUMAR

Citation / case number
CRM-M 69277/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MUKESH KUMAR
Respondent
BINAY KUMAR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-69277-2025 1 267 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-69277-2025 Date of Decision: 18.05.2026 MUKESH KUMAR ... PETITIONER VERSUS BINAY KUMAR ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent. H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the impugned order dated 15.10.2025 (Annexure P-10) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mukerian, vide which, the evidence of the petitioner stands closed by Court order in Case No.NACT/147/2022, titled as “Mukesh Kumar Vs. Binay Kumar”. 2. Briefly stated that petitioner-complainant had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which is registerd at NACT No.147 of 2022 titled as “Mukesh Kumar Vs. Binay Kumar”. Thereafter, respondent/accused was summoned by the Court concerned. The respondent/accused firstly did not appear inspite of the service and, as such, vide order dated 27.03.2023, he was summoned through bailable warrants and thereafter non-bailable warrants were also issued against him. Finally, the proclaimation was issued under Sec