Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

MUKESH KUMAR SAINI vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 3779/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MUKESH KUMAR SAINI
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

203 CRM-M-3779-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3779-2026 Date of decision: 25.05.2026 MUKESH KUMAR SAINI ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. P.K. Rohilla, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG Haryana. Mr. P.S. Sullar, Advocate for the complainant. ..… RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.210 dated 11.11.2025 registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338 of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Buria, District Yamuna Nagar. 2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner misused the complainant’s signatures and prepared a fake agreement to sell and cheated the complainant. Hence, the present FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no concern with the alleged fraud. He submits that all the payments have been duly made to the complainant and receiving has been obtained in this regard. He submits that due to the greedy natu