MUJAHID vs STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M-15685-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 218 CRM-M-15685-2026 Date of Decision: 22.05.2026 Mujahid ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Dr. Mohammad Arshad, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.52 dated 28.05.2025, registered under Section 318(4), 319, 121(1), 132, 221, 351(3), 241 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, at Police Station Akera, District Nuh. 2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner along with other co-accused had committed cyber fraud and duped the innocent persons. Hence the present FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no concern with the alleged fraud. He argued that there is no incriminating evidence on record to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence. He DINESH BANSAL 2026.05.22 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and int