Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-15

MUDIT RAI vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 1014/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MUDIT RAI
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 201 CRM-M-1014-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 15.05.2026 Mudit Rai … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advocate and Ms. Kajal Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Singh Pannu, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ***** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated 13.01.2026 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is no more required in this case. 2. Reply dated 10.02.2026 by way of an affidavit of Varun Kumar, HPS, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Crime-II, Faridabad, already filed in the Registry by the State counsel, is taken on record. 3. Learned State counsel has not refuted the aforesaid assertions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and, on instructions from ASI Jawahar Singh, further submits that the petitioner is not required by the police for further investigation or custodial interrogation. 4. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition