MS TAPASHI CHAKRABORTY ALIAS RINKU vs MR SHIVNER ASTHANA

Judgment text excerpt

$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 05th May, 2026 + CM(M) 1028/2026 MS TAPASHI CHAKRABORTY ALIAS RINKU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon, Ms. Zeba Khair, Ms. Pooja Giri & Ms. Khushi, Advs. versus MR SHIVNER ASTHANA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Bhalla, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPLs.30064-30065/2026 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of. CM(M) 1028/2026 & CM APPL. 30063/2026 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner / judgment debtor under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 02nd April, 2026 passed by learned Trial Court in Execution Petition No. 69/2026, seeking the following reliefs: “a) Call for the records; admit the petition and quash and set aside the order dated 02/04/2026 passed by Ld. Trial Court in Execution Petition bearing No. 69 of 2026 whereby warrant of possession were issued against the sit property being one room at 4th floor of 1777-A/8, Signature Not Verified Signed By:NAMITA CM(M) 1028/2026 Page 1 of 3 DHYANI Signing Date:06.05.2026 11:45:59 Govindpuri Extension, New Delhi – 110019; and b) Pass an order thereby extending time of six months period for complying with the order dated 18/08/2025, whereby the consent decree was passed by the Ld. Trial Court;” 4. Learned Counsel for the respondent/decree holder appears on advance notice and accepts notice. 5. Heard. Record perused. 6. During the course of arguments, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, being a single lady, be granted some more time to vacate the suit property. 7. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that