Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-08

MS NAVYA MINOR THROUGH HER NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FATHER vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Citation / case number
CWP 14297/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MS NAVYA MINOR THROUGH HER NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FATHER
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

` 101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14297-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.05.2026 Navya (minor) through her father Anil Sinha …Petitioner Vs. Union of India and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. Amar Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shreyansi Verma, Central Govt. Counsel for UOI. Mr. Sumeet Jain, Addl. Standing Counsel and Mr. Dhruv Chowfla, Jr. Panel Counsel for respondent No.2 to 7. *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed raising the grievance that the respondent – Chandigarh Administration while granting admission in medical colleges is allowing OBC reservation to such candidates who have migrated from other States. Reliance is placed on the notification issued by the Chandigarh Administration dated 04.09.2024, which records that for cases of migration, the benefit of OBC would be restricted to the parent State to which candidate belongs. It is, therefore, submitted that the action on the part of the respondents in granting benefit of OBC reservation to candidates who have migrated from other S