MS MS WINE vs THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHETS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ( Sr. No.182 ) CWP No.15841 of 2026 Date of decision: 21.05.2026 M/s M. S. Wine .....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) (1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the orders passed by respondent No.3 dated 09.02.2026 and 13.02.2026, the petitioner has filed an appeal before respondent No.2 which is pending since February 2026 and in the meanwhile, the petitioner is not being able to earn his livelihood. Therefore, a prayer is made for issuance of direction to respondent No.2 to expeditiously dispose of the petitioner’s aforesaid appeal. (2) Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the aforesaid prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. SUNIL YADAV 2026.05.26 09:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh CWP No.15841 of 2026 [2] (3) In the facts of this case, we find the afore prayer made on behalf of the petitioner to be reasonable and there