Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-05-13

MR. VINOD BHATIA & ANR. vs PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK & ANR.

Citation / case number
CM(M)-4175/2024 2026:DHC:4212
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MR. VINOD BHATIA & ANR.
Respondent
PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 06th May, 2026 Date of Decision: 13th May, 2026 CM(M) 4175/2024 & CM APPL. 75736/2024 MR. VINOD BHATIA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Singh Chauhan, Mr. Rajat Joshi, Ms. Eesha Garg and Ms. Saloni Singh, Advocates. versus PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Seema Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 25th October, 2024 passed by the learned District Judge-08, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS No. CS DJ/20095/2016, whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Order VII Rule 14(3) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) seeking permission to place additional documents on record has been dismissed. 3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record. 4. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has argued that the learned 5. Per c