Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-06

MOHIT vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 16370/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MOHIT
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-16370-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2026:PHHC:071004 §ieeearete apiaeao rs cig 230 CRM-M-16370-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:06.05.2026 Mohit ... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Lathwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana. Manisha Batra, J. (Oral). 1. The instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.182 dated 11.07.2024, registered under Section 22 of the NDPS Act (Challan was presented under Sections 22-C and 29 of the NDPS Act), at Police Station PGIMS Rohtak, District Rohtak. 2. As per the allegations, on 11.07.2024, on receipt of a secret information to the effect that the petitioner along with co-accused Aryan was indulged in the sale of prohibited medicines, namely, Onerex and on that very day also, they had brought such medicines from Delhi and were to sell the same in the area of Rohtak, a barricade was laid. The petitioner and co- accused were apprehended when they came in a swift c