Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-29

MOHIT VASHISTH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 29884/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MOHIT VASHISTH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-29884-2026 (O&M) 1 2026:PHHC:085534 Sega ars BeOee ass IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29884-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 29.05.2026 MOHIT VASHISTH «PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .+s RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Ashish Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. This is the first petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 (corresponding to Section 439 Cr.P.C.) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 728 dated 06.11.2025 (Annexure P-1) U/s 21(c), 29 NDPS Act [Section 111(2) BNS (New Section) added later on] registered at P.S. City Yamunanagar, District Yamunanagar, Haryana. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioner has been nominated only on the basis of the disclosure statement of the co-accused. It has been further submitted that the alleged contraband ie. 1.103 kgs of heroin, was recovered from the co-accused Sartaj and Nahim and not from the present petitioner. He further submits that there is no material available with the prosecuti