Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

MOHIT @ MOHIT BHADANA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 38885/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MOHIT @ MOHIT BHADANA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.38885 of 2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.38885 of 2025 (O&M) Reserved on: 19.05.2026 Date of Decision :21.05.2026 Mohit @ Mohit Bhadana ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Puneet Bali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jasman Singh Gill, Mr. Manoj Kumar Sood, and Mr. Avi Kaushik, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Aman Pal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepak Saini, Advocate and Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate for the complainant. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.36 dated 21.02.2024, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, Police Station Sector-17, Faridabad. 2. In nut-shell, the facts emerging from record are that the FIR of this case came into being at the instance of ‘Govind Kaushik’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. The pith and subst