MOHD ADIL vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.11587 of 2026 Mohd. Adil ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent 1. The date when the judgment is reserved 20.05.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 22.05.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 22.05.2026 website 4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced 5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Advocate and Mr. AVS Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. *** MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. The instant one is the second petition as filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, MANJU 2026.05.22 12:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order /judgment Chandigarh CRM-M No.11587 of 2026 -2- 2023 (For short “BNSS”) seeking regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.274 dated 29.06.2023 initially registered under Sections 148, 149, 307, 323, 506 and 120-B of IPC (Section 302 of IPC was added and Sec