Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

MOHAMMAD @ MOHD. HUSSAIN vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 15433/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MOHAMMAD @ MOHD. HUSSAIN
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

208 CRM-M-15433-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15433-2026 Date of decision: 04.05.2026 MOHAMMAD @ MOHD. HUSSAIN ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Talim Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG Haryana. Mr. Shishir Mathur, Advocate for the complainant. ..… RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0170 dated 10.09.2024, registered under Sections 409, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, at Police Station Pinangwa, District Nuh. 2. The allegations against the petitioner are that he along with co-accused embezzled an amount of Rs.1,20,00,000/- of the complainant company. Hence the present FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further contends that co-accused namely Mohd. Shan and Rishabh Rastogi who were working under the petitioner had hatched a conspiracy with each other and transferred excess amount in his company’s firm