MIRU HANSDA vs STATE OF HARYANA

106 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-16929 of 2026 Date of Decision: 07.05.2026 Miru Hansda ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh. Present: Mr. Mohit Girdhar, Mr. Sanyam Yadav and Mr. Nishant Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent. Mr. Pradeep Virk, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kamal Deep Sehra, Advocate for the complainant. Surya Partap Singh, J. 1. This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No. 240 dated 21.08.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 115, 140(2), 308(5), 351(3) and 61(2) of ‘the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023’ and Section(s) 25, 27 and 30 of ‘the Arms Act, 1959’ Police Station Civil Lines, District Sonipat, Haryana. 2. Vide order dated 02.04.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer.